ASC 740: First Principles

Why should GAAP care how the tax code measures income?

Your controller presents the year-end financial statements. It’s been a good year and the company earned $12 million of pretax income.

A week later, the tax return is completed and shows that taxable income is only $8 million.

During the executive meeting, someone asks a perfectly reasonable question, “which one is right?”

The answer surprises many people. Both

There aren’t two businesses and there weren’t two sets of transactions. There is only one company.

So why did two legitimate systems arrive at two different answers?

That question lies at the heart of ASC 740.

The tax code doesn’t exist to measure economic performance

Financial reporting and tax law observe the same business, but they serve very different purposes.

Financial reporting exists to faithfully represent the company’s economic performance and financial position. Investors, lenders, owners, and management rely on those financial statements to understand how much value the business created and how that value was generated.

The tax code has a different objective. It determines how much tax a business legally owes under rules established by city, state, and federal governments.

Those rules don’t exist simply to measure economic performance. They also exist to raise revenue, administer the tax system consistently, and implement public policy.

Since the objectives are different, the measurements are often different. That isn’t a flaw in either system. It’s exactly what each system was designed to do.

Different measurements create real economic consequences

Imagine your company purchases new manufacturing equipment.

Financial reporting recognizes the cost over the years the equipment helps generate revenue because that best reflects the underlying economics. While tax law may allow much of that cost to be deducted immediately.

Nothing about the equipment changed and nothing about the company’s operations changed. Only the measurement changed, and that different measurement produces something very real. It changes when taxes will be paid.

Those future tax payments aren’t theoretical. They are legally enforceable consequences created by today’s transactions.

That means they have become part of the company’s economic reality.

Why ASC 740 exists

Once a company’s transactions create future tax consequences, those consequences become just as real as any other future cash obligation or benefit.

Ignoring them would leave users of the financial statements with an incomplete picture of the company’s financial position.

ASC 740 exists to prevent that. It requires companies to recognize not only the taxes currently owed, but also the future tax consequences that today’s transactions have already created.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities aren’t separate economic events. They’re the future tax effects of economic activity that has already occurred. The accounting simply ensures those consequences are reflected when they become part of the company’s economic reality, rather than waiting until cash is finally paid or received.

Why valuation allowances exist

Not every future tax benefit will ultimately be realized.

A company may generate tax loss carryforwards that reduce future taxes, but those benefits have value only if the company is expected to generate enough future taxable income to use them.

If that future benefit is unlikely to be realized, the financial statements should reflect that reality as well.

Again, the objective isn’t to follow the tax return, it’s to faithfully represent the economic consequences that the tax system creates.

Bringing It All Together

ASC 740 isn’t fundamentally about deferred taxes. It’s about faithfully representing the economic consequences created by the tax system.

Financial reporting measures economic performance, while tax law determines legally enforceable tax obligations under a different set of objectives.

Those different measurement systems naturally produce different answers. When those differences create future tax obligations or future tax benefits, they become part of the company’s economic reality.

Everything else in ASC 740 follows naturally from that principle.

A company’s economic activity creates legally enforceable tax consequences under the measurement systems established by city, state, and federal taxing authorities. Those consequences are part of the company’s economic reality and need to be reflected in the financial statements.

ASC 740 exists to faithfully represent those consequences to the users of the financial statements.